Sun-sign astrology is interesting & deep into interpretation of zodiac signs, but it has got many failings.
Even I have seen people practicing Sun Sign, Moon Sign & Ascendent approach. The followers of Linda Goodman would obviously fall into such kinds of astrology. Linda Goodman claimed that Sun sign represents 80 percent of one's psychological nature. She claimed that nothing dims the power of your Sun sign. No matter however your chart might be but if you are born on 10 Aug then you remain a Leo. I would definitely dispute this.
I respect Linda as a brillant astrological writer & interpreter of Zodiac Signs but I don't agree to every
thing that she might say. Moreover Linda Goodman was not the first writer of sun Sign astrology. I have
read a book of Bulter (1887) & few books of Cheiro. These writers lived before Linda. Bulter's book was Sun Sign astrological types. Cheiro also practiced Sunsign astrology but he mixed numerology brilliantly into the Sunsign game. Cheiro made sense as he invented a new type of mixture of Sunsign astrology & numerology. Moreover you can find the interpretations of moon signs, sun-signs, ascendent etc. in Vedic classics dated thousands & hundred of years before.
But Sun Sign alone never defines a person, do remember this fact. Sun-sign can never be predictive. It can't give events of a person's lives. That's my observation & belief.
In Western astrology the signs of Aries, Gem. , Leo, Libra, Saggi. & Aqu. are known as positive signs
as they are either fiery or airy. They are known as extrovert signs. While other watery & earth signs are known as negative signs. They are introvert in nature.
So we can expect a person with ascendent , sun & moon in all negative signs as introverts as per Sunsign
astrology. But here lies the pit fall. I have observed that if the Sun or the moon is posited in ascendent
in the Vedic chart then it makes person quite interactive with the world. They no longer remain introverts.
Sun in the ascendent makes one quite bold. Here wins the Vedic astrology. I would not disrespect any
western astrologer too who is deep into astrology & concentrates on houses, aspects, lordships & other tools too.
But I would definitely say that Sun Sign astrology, although interesting, has got limitations.
The chart should be analyzed house wise. Planetary astrology or House wise astrology is much powerful than
the sign wise astrology. Vedic astrology is a sort of planetary & house wise astrology & house div. techniques applied by Vedic astrology are damn accurate & brilliant compared to western astrology. This is my conviction.
Even I have seen people practicing Sun Sign, Moon Sign & Ascendent approach. The followers of Linda Goodman would obviously fall into such kinds of astrology. Linda Goodman claimed that Sun sign represents 80 percent of one's psychological nature. She claimed that nothing dims the power of your Sun sign. No matter however your chart might be but if you are born on 10 Aug then you remain a Leo. I would definitely dispute this.
I respect Linda as a brillant astrological writer & interpreter of Zodiac Signs but I don't agree to every
thing that she might say. Moreover Linda Goodman was not the first writer of sun Sign astrology. I have
read a book of Bulter (1887) & few books of Cheiro. These writers lived before Linda. Bulter's book was Sun Sign astrological types. Cheiro also practiced Sunsign astrology but he mixed numerology brilliantly into the Sunsign game. Cheiro made sense as he invented a new type of mixture of Sunsign astrology & numerology. Moreover you can find the interpretations of moon signs, sun-signs, ascendent etc. in Vedic classics dated thousands & hundred of years before.
But Sun Sign alone never defines a person, do remember this fact. Sun-sign can never be predictive. It can't give events of a person's lives. That's my observation & belief.
In Western astrology the signs of Aries, Gem. , Leo, Libra, Saggi. & Aqu. are known as positive signs
as they are either fiery or airy. They are known as extrovert signs. While other watery & earth signs are known as negative signs. They are introvert in nature.
So we can expect a person with ascendent , sun & moon in all negative signs as introverts as per Sunsign
astrology. But here lies the pit fall. I have observed that if the Sun or the moon is posited in ascendent
in the Vedic chart then it makes person quite interactive with the world. They no longer remain introverts.
Sun in the ascendent makes one quite bold. Here wins the Vedic astrology. I would not disrespect any
western astrologer too who is deep into astrology & concentrates on houses, aspects, lordships & other tools too.
But I would definitely say that Sun Sign astrology, although interesting, has got limitations.
The chart should be analyzed house wise. Planetary astrology or House wise astrology is much powerful than
the sign wise astrology. Vedic astrology is a sort of planetary & house wise astrology & house div. techniques applied by Vedic astrology are damn accurate & brilliant compared to western astrology. This is my conviction.
No comments:
Post a Comment